Grow Your Brand Inside a Company and Then Break Free

November 26, 2008 at 7:52 pm | In Career Development, Interview, People, Personal Branding, Success Strategies, social media | 2 Comments

Today, I spoke with Peter Kim, whose had a very inspirational career, starting at Puma, then Forrester Research and now he’s broken away to help lead a new startup. I met Peter at the beginning of this year and we finally got around to this interview. Peter shares some great perspectives on what it takes to build a personal brand within a company and as an entrepreneur. After researching and reporting on social media trends at Forrester, Peter gives us a glimpse on how that stuff matters to our brands today.

Peter, from Puma to Forrester to your own consulting business, what have you taken away from each job that’s helped you move to the next?

I’ve learned to seek out opportunities that that pose new challenges. I’m intellectually curious and think that it’s important to build on what you’ve got.

  • Puma allowed me to manage both a multi-million Euro P&L and global cross-functional team.
  • Forrester helped me connect with C-level executives and top-tier media.

None of these elements are apparent yet in The Dachis Corporation, aka my stealth-mode startup – but I’ll use what I know to help build us into a market leader. Whatever that market may be. Can’t tell you yet.

Were you always an entrepreneur wanting to go your separate path? Did you know you wanted to start your own business while happily employed at these companies?

No. My father just retired after 35 years with the same organization; I think earlier generations could be happily employed somewhere based on the promises of the future. However, their future is now and we are seeing promises broken everyday.

For our generation, it’s more important to be “consciously engaged.”

No one should feel so tied to a job that they can’t leave to grow – isn’t that what “at will” employment means, anyway? We need to learn how to take charge of our learning opportunities, 401(k)s, and personal brands - which will lead to different choices along the way.

What originally interested you in the social web? Do you think web 2.0 has gone mainstream and what lies in the future (web 3.0)?

I originally got involved with social media because of a blogger controversy. At the time, I got some people fired up by saying that blogs aren’t a media outlet. I find it ironic that as social media outlets become successful, they start to look like mainstream media and as mainstream media struggles to retain success, it starts to look more like social media. Social media is still mainstreaming and will truly arrive once technology infrastructure and industry economics catch up. I don’t know what happens then, but it will be driven by a balance of personal and commercial intent.

What advice can you give to those who are employed at a company and want to escape their day job, in a bad economy? Should they wait?

My advice comes from colleague Doug Rushkoff - get back in the box! Do what you love to do. But how soon is now? It’s whenever you decide it should be. I think I heard that life expectancy for kids born these days is over 100 years. That’s a lot of time to be spent unhappy. In the long run, our careers will regress to the mean with both good and bad jobs and hopefully we’ll all have been on a relatively upward slope. Unless your name is Sisyphus, figure out what you love to do, at least for now, as soon as possible.

How do you think web 2.0 has/will change how people work at companies? Will Gen-Y have an effect on this?
Social technologies have started to change the way people work together and how organizations run, but so far we’ve only seen proof of concept. I believe that a huge opportunity exists to help businesses adapt to a new mode of connected operations. That’s what my startup is focusing on. Gen-Y uses social tools to a greater extent today and the boomer’s know how to operate businesses at scale. A combination of experience and intuition will help move us forward.

——
Peter Kim is currently working with a stealth-mode startup, building an enterprise social services and technology company. He was previously a Forrester Research analyst, focusing on social computing and marketing organizations. Prior to Forrester, Peter was in charge of PUMA’s global interactive marketing, internal creative agency, and marketing finance. He also held strategy consulting positions at Razorfish and Coopers & Lybrand.

Peter has been widely quoted on marketing in the press, including media outlets such as Advertising Age, Brandweek, and The Economist, as well as appearances on CBS, CNBC, CNN, and NPR. He has been a keynote speaker, effective panel moderator, and workshop facilitator for the ARF, AMA, DMA, Forrester and WOMMA, in addition to dozens of client events.

By Not Having a Website You Lose Brand Equity Every Second

November 26, 2008 at 12:17 pm | In Career Development, Personal Branding, Success Strategies, eBrand | 4 Comments

There are a lot of great personal brands out there that are losing the opportunity to build brand equity in their eBrands (internet properties).

For instance, if you write a guest blog post or an article for an online magazine and don’t have a website, you miss the chance to:

  • increase the PageRank of your website
  • get traffic to your website
  • convert web article readers to website readers
  • find out whose interested in your services
  • build a list through your blog or email newsletter
  • sell products and services
  • measure the effectiveness and reach of your article
  • get other opportunities to write

The list goes on!

When you include your bio in a blog post or article, always include a website. If you haven’t started a blog or traditional website, then link to your LinkedIn profile or Twitter account. If you have no web presence, then start working on this this Thanksgiving weekend. You are at a real loss if you keep marketing your personal brand, without advancing the equity in your eBrand. Links to domains you own are more significant than links to social networking sites because they are in your complete control. When you link to a LinkedIn profile, you are helping LinkedIn, and not as much yourself.

Next time you write your bio, make sure it includes a link to a site you own.

Gen-Y Brands Will Hold the Recruiting Power Very Soon!

November 26, 2008 at 1:23 am | In Book Reviews, Career Development, Employer Branding, Interview, Personal Branding, Recruitment, Success Strategies, gen-y | 2 Comments

Today, I spoke with Tamara J. Erickson, who completely made my day.  She’s a generational expert and her latest book is on Gen-Y.  The coolest thing I got out of this interview is the fact that the amount of jobs in our economy will be greater than the amount of Gen-Y’ers to fill positions, even though there are 75 million of us.  This will allow us to have more recruiting power and as a result, we will be able to negotiate and get paid more.  Aside from this, Tamara talks about the issues Gen-Y will face and what they (we) need to do to succeed.

Tammy, can you paint a portrait of the stereotypical Gen-Y for us?

Most Gen Ys are what I like to callimmediate” — eager to live life fully today. This trait is often interpreted by older generations as “impatient” or “unwilling to pay your dues but it actually relates much more to the influence of random events, such as terrorism and school violence, on Ys’ view of the world. In a random world, making sure that what you’re doing today is fulfilling, meaningful, and enjoyable just makes sense. Ys are also confident and optimistic (they’ve grew up in a consistently positive economic climate until this year and have heard positive, esteem-building messages from the adults in their lives), tolerant, and eager to learn. They’re also very family-centric.

“Ninety percent of Ys say they are very close to their parents — a huge change from Boomers (when they were teens, more than 40 percent said they’d be better off with no parents!).”

Relative to Gen-X and baby boomers, what competitive advantages and threats does Gen-Y have while they grow up and become workers?

Gen Ys have one huge advantage: without even trying, they will bring innovative ideas to the workplace, simply because many of the ways they do “things” are . . . well, different. For example, Ys rarely schedule. If two Ys want to get together, they most likely would text to ascertain each other’s coordinates — and then would home in on each other, like ships following radar. This is very different from the way corporations today operate; most activities rely on long-range plans and detailed schedules. Not every Y-way will work for every situation, but organizations that are smart enough to pay attention to the possibilities have the potential for some real innovations.

There’s also early evidence that Ys are able to perform some tasks more quickly than older employees — perhaps because they are more adept at using technology, perhaps due to comfort with multi-tasking. Many managers tell me they are struggling to come up with enough work to keep their Y employees challenged and busy.

The biggest threat to Ys is that they won’t “get” how corporations work. To Ys, many corporations feel like mysterious secret societies, full of unwritten rules. They find themselves irritating older colleagues for reasons that they don’t even fathom or, more commonly, feeling frustrated because they aren’t making the progress or having the impact they’d hoped to have. One of my key objectives in Plugged In is to help Ys figure out how organizations work — what they should expect — as well as how they can have an impact and help the organization change.

What 3 pieces of interview advice would you lend to Gen-Y?

1) Be ready to articulate a compelling reason why you want to work at that company. Nothing is more appealing than authentic enthusiasm. The reasons may include how a specific element of your previous experience can contribute to an objective or program the organization has underway (do your research in advance!) or what you want to learn from this job. The specifics are less important than simply having a logical, well-informed, and enthusiastic reason.

2) Ask (polite) questions about what it is really like to work there. Most of the complaints Ys have after six months on the job have to do with the day-to-day reality of how work gets done — excessive layers of required approvals, too many boring meetings, bureaucracy, lack of equipment, or unfriendly colleagues. Try, if possible, to meet the people that you’ll actually be working with on a day-to-day basis; they can make or break the experience. Don’t be dazzled by the company’s brand or reputation without really digging in to understand what your job will be like.

3) Leave your parents at home (and out of sight). Okay, I know most Ys don’t bring parents to the interviews — but a few do allow mom or dad to be a little more visible in the process than many managers are quite ready to accept. It’s so easy for older managers to mistake Y’s close relationship with parents and (I think) sensible tendency to rely on people who have expertise to contribute as a lack of confidence or self-sufficiency. Don’t give them any excuse to hesitate in hiring you!

After getting a job out of college, which is obviously tough in this economy, what tips would you give to Gen-Y for being successful in their first 6 months to a year?

Make sure you understand (and negotiate, as necessary) the work place norms. The four most common sources of conflict among the generations at work are:

  • How members of each generation view time and place — Older colleagues often view work as a place — a location you go to at a specified time. Work used to require synchronous activity — it would be hard to run an assembly line if everyone wasn’t there at the same time — but for much of the work today it’s no longer necessary. However, older colleagues often still use adherence to time and place norms as a sign of commitment or team work and misinterpret a Y who arrives “late” or works from the local Starbucks.
  • How they communicate — Ys are much more comfortable using text and social networking than members of older generation are. Older colleagues may not only be uncomfortable with digital communication, they may even feel offended by a lack of face-to-face interaction.
  • How they get together – Older generations are planners and schedulers; Ys are coordinators. Boomers may be annoyed by younger team members’ seemingly ad hoc approach.
  • How they find information or learn — Ys like to learn “on demand” — to figure things out as they go, reaching out to personal contacts with relevant expertise for information or referrals, as needed. Ys are likely to be bored and turned off by what an older colleague may view as a necessary training phase.

The key is not that anyone’s approach is right or wrong, but that it’s important for Ys to discuss expectations with other colleagues to make sure that there are no misunderstandings.

Gen-Y has about 75 million people, which is much greater than the other generations. How do you think this will change the workforce and what can employers do now to prepare?

Gen Y will change the workforce dynamic in several ways. First, although this is a huge generation, they are fewer in number than the number of jobs the economy is likely to create over the next decade. Granted, the current slowdown is putting a dent in the near-term job market, but longer-term, the demographic trends are pretty compelling. Birth rates have fallen dramatically over the past several decades in the U.S. (and most other countries around the world), while the size of the economy has continued to grow. As the economy rebounds, it will have the capacity to create more jobs than the Gen Y’s could fill.

This phenomenon will intensify in the segment of the job market that is looking for college-educated employees; the number of jobs there will significantly outstrip the number of Y’s with college degrees.

“All of this adds up to provide workers of all ages with greater leverage — to tip the balance in the employee-employer equation toward employees, allowing individuals to negotiate arrangements that are more desirable than have been available in the past — more flexible, varied, learning-oriented, and lucrative.”

Because of this added leverage, Ys are likely to be able to bring many of their preferences — asynchronous work patterns, more frequent task rotations, even corporate objectives that include greater balance on social good — into the reality of the workplace.

Employers should begin today to create a wide variety of flexible work arrangements — project-based options, virtual work, self-scheduling, and other approaches. And, they should help managers develop confidence and skill in managing a rapidly changing workforce.

——-
Tamara J. Erickson is both a McKinsey Award-winning author and popular and engaging storyteller. Her compelling views of the future are based on extensive research on changing demographics and employee values and, most recently, on how successful organizations work. Erickson has co-authored four Harvard Business Review articles and the books Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work and Retire Retirement: Career Strategies for the Boomer Generation. She is with nGenera .

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.