Work’s a Bitch and Then You Make it Work!

December 5, 2008 at 11:57 pm | In Book Reviews, Career Development, Interview, Personal Branding, Success Strategies | 3 Comments

Today, I spoke with Andrea Kay, who is one of the nations most well-known and respected career experts.   We discuss why people don’t like work, kill the myth of work/life balance and discuss various tips you can use to turn your passion into money!   Andrea is here to give you hope, despite the bad economy and to give you some great advice about what you can start doing today to make a difference in your own life.

Andrea, does work have to be a bitch?

Absolutely not! Of course, nothing is perfect. No matter how much you enjoy your work and career, you will have annoying moments, difficult interactions and duties you don’t  relish. But your career doesn’t have to be so bad that you suffer because of it–which is what is happening. The complaints, frustrations and feelings about things being unfair and a “bitch” have become louder than ever.

People subscribe to the understanding that the work relationship is one of exchange. But that relationship is off kilter, with workers feeling there’s a big imbalance in the relationship between them and the workplace. They feel they have no life, due to the perception or reality that they have to work more or be constantly connected to work. They feel companies don’t care—that companies treat them like inventory. They feel they are working harder and getting less. In the job hunt, they feel like they’re treated badly. They feel helpless and powerless. All of this—and more I talk about in the book—can add up to bad days at the office and a lamentable career outlook.

But there are six steps you can take to lesson, even eliminate your suffering—despite everything that is wrong and broken in the workplace. Even though there are many forces you don’t control, there is plenty you can do to stop your work and career from being a bitch.

The first one this: Decide to start where things are, not where you think they should be.”

You may think something is unfair or shouldn’t be the way it is. That may be, but unless you decide to examine how else you could look at the situation and then change what you’re doing about it–nothing will be different and you will be pissed off and powerless.

What types of work do you consider would “be a bitch” and why?

It’s not a matter of the type of work someone does that’s a bitch. It’s circumstance, situations and treatment that make things seem intolerable. There are interactions with certain customers and co-workers. Bosses that can’t think their way out of a paper bag. Managers who don’t keep promises. Poor references when you’re job hunting. Not knowing where you stand in your company.

Interview processes. People who don’t do what they say they will do. Being fired. Not getting  recognition. Not feeling secure about your career, where you fit or how to stay valuable. Being replaced by technology. Not getting a response when job hunting. Constantly being barraged by technology—cell phone, e-mail, Blackberries. Not feeling like you can contribute, speak your mind and do good work.

What tips do you have for people who want to make money doing what they love, but have financial problems and a weak degree?  Basically, someone who feels forced into a corner, and has given up both hope and confidence in their career.

A degree and finances is not what stops someone from making money doing what they love.

“What stops them is clarity about how what they love to do fits into the marketplace.”

Why would someone pay you to do this work? Then it takes a step-by-step plan and strategy to get there. If you need more or different training, that’s part of the plan. You may or may not need that.

Look at how you got “forced into a corner.” What did you give up? What didn’t you know or do? Unless someone is holding a gun to your head, you’re free to make a plan and work it. Get to it. You can do anything. But it does take work, planning, sticking to your plan, strategic marketing, focus and patience. Why would you give up what you want? Have you done everything you can to get it? Probably not.

How would someone create a work environment that makes sense for them?

“The question you need to ask yourself, is what kind of environment do I like to work in?”

Being inside, outside or a combination. Do you want to be in a lab or an office? Do you want a lot of structure? Do you want a more formal and hierarchical environment. What’s your ideal?

Is work/life balance dead?  Is it still possible to manage your work life and social life, even in a poor economy?

To me, the notion of trying to find, have or get “work/life balance” is silly. It just isn’t a thing. The idea notion of  “work/life balance” implies that it’s something “out there” that you can strive for and get. That if you spend less time connected to work, you’ll have “it.” That’s not how it works.

“You find balance in knowing what matters to you.”

If you know what matters most to you in life, then you live your life accordingly and won’t need to seek “work/life balance.” I have an exercise in my book to help people understand this. What’s the economy have to do with it?

———

Andrea Kay is a career consultant and executive coach who has helped thousands of job hunters and employees cut to the heart of their frustration and dissatisfaction to take control of their careers. She has published five books, including her latest one called Work’s a Bitch and Then You Make It Work: 6 steps to go from Pissed off to Powerful.    Andrea has presented workshops and counseled employees at such companies as Procter & Gamble, Apple Computers, Westinghouse, Frito-Lay, and General Electric.

What Would You Differently if You Were in College Again?

December 5, 2008 at 12:24 pm | In Career Development, Personal Branding, Success Strategies, gen-y | 14 Comments

From time to time, I get asked certain questions that I think could benefit a larger audience. Many of my blog readers are still in college right now, so I figured today would be the perfect day to go through two questions, so you can think about them this weekend. If you, like me, are a college graduate, you might want to take this time to reminisce, laugh or give suggestions in this posts comment section that can benefit us.

Question: “Thinking back when you were in college what would you have done differently with the knowledge that you now have?”

The context of this question relates to career development, branding and getting a job upon college graduation. It has nothing to do with partying really hard, hooking up with girls/guys and alcohol abuse (not that we have done any of that ;) ). This is a tricky question because social media wasn’t important or heavily used back then. I didn’t know about it and I bet you didn’t as well (I graduated Bentley University in 2006). I learned about social media in late 2006.

I was a marketing major and did everything I possibly could to get a job back then, including holding (self-promotion alert!) 8 internships, 7 leadership positions on campus, my own consulting business and high academic honors. I didn’t understand the significance of networking back then (I feel old) and as a result it took me much longer to find a job. For example, one of my friends has an uncle that is an executive at my company. The uncle made a single call and my friend had the job. I, on the other hand, went through 15 people, over three different positions, to get the job I wanted out of school. The entire process took me a total of 8 months. The smart thing I did was start applying for jobs early and as a result I started work a little more than one month after graduating.

Lesson: Avoid networking in college at your own peril.

A lot of the knowledge I have now, I had back then, minus some philosophies and social tools. I never called it “personal branding” back in college, but instead preached about “marketing yourself.” I think a lot of college students now are behind the times, which surprises a lot of people when I tell them that. Most college students don’t know what LinkedIn is, nor how to properly leverage it to get a job.

Since LinkedIn wasn’t popular back then and Facebook was solely for college students, I had to figure out where to go to network with others. If I were to go back, I would have networked more with the people in my “major classes,” meaning the ones where you definitely have something in common with everyone else. Also, your teachers, parents, career counselors and friends are great resources. I’ve mentioned the network strength pyramid twice before and it’s in my book. It emphasizes how your family will go out of their way to help you when you’re in need of a job. As you move down the pyramid, there are more people (friends and then acquaintances), but fewer will help you out. Attending networking events and career fairs can help as well.

I also submitted my resume to Careerbuilder.com, erecruiting.com and Monster.com, while searching through their databases for open positions. erecruiting was the best of the three because it connected me to “pre-qualified positions,” where the school had a relationship with the employer. I got a few leads off of Monster, such as Timberland and a few leads off of erecruiting, such as TJX. I’m glad I didn’t avoid these services, but I couldn’t imagine claiming a great job through them.

Lesson: The 80/20 rule of job hunting says to “spend 80% of your time networking and 20% of your time on job boards.

If I were to go back to freshman year, I would have made more friends in other dorms, instead of staying confined in my dorm because that limited my social circle (network). Also, I would have hoped to start pulling together a career plan freshman year, instead of just focusing on grades. I feel like I did the right thing joining a fraternity sophomore year because it enabled me to spend all of my energy on my career and none of it on figuring out my social situation. I think it really helped me that I did internships early in college because I was able to apply what I was doing inside the classroom to real life situations and visa versa. I also think that taking leadership positions as an undergrad was beneficial because it helped me get other positions as an upperclassman (I had a track record). Leadership positions are great because they are a sign to employer that you have that critical skill.

Lesson: Get internships and take classes in your field simultaneously for cross-learning purposes.

Interview with NY Times Bestselling Author Ori Brafman

December 5, 2008 at 12:59 am | In Book Reviews, Interview, People, Personal Branding | 3 Comments

Today, I spoke with Ori Brafman, who is the New York Times bestselling author of Sway. We spoke about how people are swayed to make the wrong decisions, what influences our professional and personal lives and “value attribution,” which is how much value your employer places on your head. I hope this conversation sways you to make some better career moves :)

Ori, in general, why do people make the decisions that they do, whether in business or in their personal lives?

Ideally, we want to make decisions based on sound reason and concrete data. But of course, that’s not always the case, especially when there’s a lot on the line or when we’re feeling stressed. That’s when we become increasingly more vulnerable to the influence of a host of psychological forces that makes us more likely to act irrationally. And by irrational I mean choices that are not in our best interest.

This process is largely unconscious. We don’t even realize we’re getting swayed. Then in hindsight we look back and ask, “What was I thinking? How come I made that decision?” And what we talked about in the book is that it happens to all of us, even the best trained professionals.

What are is one dynamic force that influence our personal and business lives?

One of the most powerful and intriguing forces is what economists call ‘loss aversion:’ people’s tendency to feel the pain associated with a loss twice as intensely as the joy ascribed to an equivalent-sized gain. In other words, we’re much more sensitive to losses than we are to gains. In the book we tell the story of airline pilot Captain Jacob Van Zanten, who was the head of safety at KLM airlines.

Van Zanten was flying a routine international flight from Holland to the Canary Islands, when he was told he had to land in a small island airport because his original destination airport was closed down for the moment. Van Zanten’s plane, along with several others, landed in a small local airport. Van Zanten knew perfectly well that unless he could get his plane back in the sky soon, he would be stuck on the ground overnight. That’s because the crew’s mandated rest period (legislated by Dutch law) was coming up. Staying grounded would be a logistical nightmare. Besides dealing with flight delays, there weren’t enough hotel rooms to accommodate all of the passengers.

So Van Zanten was determined to do everything he could to get his plane airborne. The potential loss associated with the logistical delays hung heavy on Van Zanten’s mind. When Van Zanten was finally issued clearance to take off, he noticed that the fog was beginning to roll into airport. Acting fast to dig himself out of a hole, Van Zanten decided to take off, not realizing that he had not been issued clearance from the tower. Unfortunately, when Van Zanten’s plane was gaining speed on the runway he saw the scariest sight imaginable: there was another plane parked on the runway. Van Zanten tried to avoid it by taking off early, but the two planes collided, resulting in the greatest air crash disaster in aeronautical history.

Van Zanten was so preoccupied with doing whatever he could to avoid a loss that he made a huge rookie mistake. And that’s what happens to us when we experience loss aversion. We go into one of two extremes: either we overreach and take on greater risks in order to make up for the initial loss, or we become completely paralyzed and unable to take on any action. You see that with the stock market, that investors either frantically trade to make up for losses or just get that deer-in-the-headlights look trying to digest what’s going on. It’s really difficult to remain collected when there’s a nagging loss tugging at you.

Why do we listen to advice just because it came from someone ‘important’?

It’s called “value attribution,” our tendency to ascribe high value to something that is highly prized or priced.

There’s a story about Nathan’s Famous Hotdogs, that when he first sold them on Coney Island the going rate was 10 cents. But he wanted to undercut the competition so he decided to make top-notch hotdogs from the finest ingredients, but sell them for only 5 cents. Well, no one bothered to buy them. Everyone was suspicious. People thought, “If he’s pricing them that low, there must be something wrong with them. I wonder what ingredients he uses.” Well, Nathan came up with a marvelous solution. He recruited doctors, dressed in white coats, come and eat his hotdogs, and then people said, “OK, if doctors are eating these, then they must be fine.”

So, yes, it’s important to pay attention to the source, but we usually pay too much attention.

Can you explain how some of your theories apply to people’s careers?http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jacket.jpg For instance, why do most job seekers have a tough time getting interviews or the positions they desire?

Again, it comes down to value attributionwhat value employers put on potential candidates. It turns out that managers are terrible at conducting job interviews. They rely on irrelevant data, and ignore all data that contradicts their initial “diagnosis.”

The thing to remember is that we can affect what “value attribution” people ascribe to us. And in the long run, that makes a huge difference.

Your book is a NY Times bestseller. What went into your promotional plan and what obstacles did you endure along the way?

I think of audiences in terms of verticals (e.g. entrepreneurs, general readers, HR professionals, etc.) Once you segment the likely readers, the question is how to best reach them. Traditional media, of course, plays a huge role. But so does word of mouth, and so do specialty blogs/newsletters that may not have huge readerships—but that appeal directly to the specific audience.

I find that it’s surprising what verticals end up being drawn to a specific book. You have to be open to the fact that a book might reach an unlikely audience.

——-
Ori Brafman has been a lifelong entrepreneur in business, government, and the nonprofit sector. In 2001, Ori co-founded a network of more than 1000 CEOs working for peace and economic development projects. Most recently, Ori has facilitated a course at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

He is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior. Ori’s first book was called The Starfish and the Spider. Ori has appeared on BBC, National Public Radio, Wall Street Journal/MarketWatch video, CSPAN, AP Video, and National-Cable-Radio among others.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.