What Social Media Tool Reveals the Transparent Brand You?
December 16, 2008 at 12:27 pm | In Futures, Personal Branding, Reputation Management, social media | 6 CommentsYou might think this is a trick question, but for now, it’s not. I’m the most transparent on Twitter. After Twitter, I
reveal more of my personal brand on this blog and then on Facebook. I’m known for different things on different services and manage my brand slightly different right now because the audiences vary. I think it’s important that you know what audience you have on each of these social networks by recognizing commenter’s, wall posters, etc. The more you can identify and send messages to the right audiences, the more success you’ll have. It’s also imperative that you don’t send inappropriate messages to audiences that may include your parents or hiring managers.
How do you brand yourself on each website?
Regardless of which website I’m on, my main brand message is extremely consistent. I brand myself as the leading personal branding expert for Gen-Y and have been for over a year. Every single website you see me on has the same picture (avatar), my name (Dan Schawbel, not Daniel or Danny) and my personal brand statement. What I mean here is the language and type of content I post to each of these websites is slightly different.
My blog: On my blog, I brand myself as a thought leader, personal branding activist and expert, as well as a commentator. I also promote a lot of people constantly, so I’ve been branded as a “giver.” I use my blog to flush out my ideas, get feedback, start conversations and as a marketing tool.
Twitter: On Twitter, I get real intimate with my audience, even though I have thousands of Twitter followers. It’s
easier to showcase more for your transparent brand when you are limited to the amount of words you can use. Twitter makes it easier to share quick thoughts or feelings. For instance, I’ve been tweeting about how my grandfather has been really sick, yet I wouldn’t really share this on Facebook or this blog (I just did, but you get the point). I’m also branded as the “quick fact” or “stat” guy on Twitter because I share interesting research I find everyday. I do a lot of Twitter polls as well.
Facebook: I don’t use Facebook much anymor
e, especially after graduating college a few years ago. The reason is simple: I have a clash in audiences on Facebook. I’m friends with my high school and college friends, summer camp friends, old teachers, family, coworkers, my manager and business contacts. If I were to be completely transparent, such as syndicating my tweets on Facebook, I would be messaging some people who either didn’t care or that would think differently of me or possibly fire me? Facebook has become a global neighborhood for your brand, from birth to death, and it forces you to remain completely transparent to all audiences. Are you ready for that?
LinkedIn: I hardly ever use LinkedIn, except to add new contacts and update my profile to ensure accuracy. Since
LinkedIn is strickly for my professional brand, I leave it that way. I don’t share anything outside of my professional life. I have a hunch that this professional network will expand and become more sociable in the future. When this happens, I think we will have a problem much greater than Facebook, which is having employers reject us immediately based on a first impression. Should be interesting!
YouTube: First, YouTube’s audience enjoys humor or viral videos. My videos aren’t supposed to be funny or viral. Instead, their main purpose is to communicate something emotionally, like I couldn’t do with words on this blog (or through pictures). To me, my YouTube audience is my blog audience because that’s where it’s promoted. People don’t really search for my material on YouTube.
Mashable: I just started as a feature writing for Mashable, which is an excellent source for all of your social
networking needs (plug!). I’m a little less revealing when I post on Mashable because their audience demands big ideas and strategies. It’s also important to note that that audience is much larger, and as humans, we will be more careful when we are “performing” to a larger audience.
Our future is hyper-transparent
In the future, transparency will be commonplace and there will be no hiding. People, like you, will be viewed by the internet paparazzi on a reoccurring basis without your permission. Some of you will welcome it, while others of you will feel threatened by it, but there will be no escape. We will all be forced to live on the web, losing the comfort and privacy of having our brand stay secluded in reality.
If we want to be discovered, and reach a mass audience, then the web is the cheapest and most efficient way of doing this. There is an opportunity cost associated with not having your brand rest online. All these social tools will be mixed, mashed, filtered and spread out, so any move you make will be seen by each website your brand lives on.
“In the end, you must be the real you because everyone else is taken and replicas don’t sell for as much. If you ever question anything you do, always revert to being yourself and your transparency will shine through.”
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Book: Me 2.0
Subscribe
Blog Syndication

Personal Branding Magazine
2008 Personal Brand Awards
Dan Schawbel
My Social Networks
Standing
-
Recent Comments
Post Calendar
Category Cloud
Articles award Book Reviews Brand Mystery Career Development eBrand events Futures gen-y guest post Interview magazine marketing Me 2.0 Misc Networking news People Personal Branding Podcasts Positioning PR Project Management Recruitment Reputation Management SEO social media Success Methodologies Success Strategies tv-
Business
Career Development
- Alison Doyle
- Career Advice Blogs
- Career Development for Scientists
- CareerDiva – Eve Tahmincioglu
- Courting Your Career
- CutEdge
- Idea’s for Passionate People
- J.T. & Dale Talk Jobs
- Jibber Jobber – Career Toolset
- Keppie Careers
- Lindsey Pollak’s Blog
- Michelle Goodman
- New Learning Playbook
- Personal Development Blog
- Secrets of the Job Hunt
- student loan
- The Blogging Boss
- The Thin Pink Line
- The Work Buzz
- Transportation Jobs
- Ultimate Resumes
- Walk-In For Jobs
- Work Life Monitor – Judy Martin
Marketing / Branding
- Blog Till You Drop
- Brand Baker
- Brand Infection
- Brand-Yourself Blog
- Branding and Marketing Blog
- Buzz Marketing Blog
- Catur PW.com
- Fill In The Blank Branding
- Legal Marketing Blog (Tom Kane)
- Personal PR
- Positioning Game
- PR^2
- The Branding Blog
- The Engaging Brand
- The Persuader
- Two Hat Marketing
- Uncensored Voice Of Marketing
- Wendy Marx: Fast Company Blog
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.





















Excellent post, Dan! I think you hit a critical point about personal branding: though messaging may vary according to the audience, the core of your brand should be visible across media. It’s a subtle point and one that many people don’t get. As I so often point out, it’s not about being all things to all people, but adjusting the structure of your communications to consistently reveal your vision and passions and help people discern the value you bring to what you do.
Comment by Walter Akana — December 16, 2008 #
Dan,
Great post on how to think about the various tools for branding. What I would add is that there are different levels of dialogue going on. My experience is that Twitter is more active (with discussions, replies, polls, etc) than Facebook (photo sharing seems to be one of the most active areas there). Facebook chat allows for some private discussions, while Twitter is more of a party-line where people can join/leave conversations that interest them.
Comment by Stuart Miniman — December 16, 2008 #
Selecting your target market is key. Then you can select the social media platforms that will be relevant to promoting your personal brand. It’s interesting how each platform has a different audience and it takes time to gain the know-how about what works with each one. But, it’s definitely worth the effort.
Comment by Chad Levitt — December 16, 2008 #
Dan, you’re right about different audiences on different sites. I’d add to that, you might even have different avatars.
For example, like you, Facebook is primarily connected to my social life. My friends post pictures of our weekends, keep in touch, or share humorous videos. I don’t exactly want my professional life creeping into Facebook.
Twitter I just started with. I’m finding the people who are successful with it just dive right in. I’m still a little apprehensive.
LinkedIn, however, has been very successful for me, especially with adding to my network/knowledge wire. For example. I just chatted with someone over a forum involving social media. Luckily we both happened to be in Chicago, and I’m doing an informational interview with him this week.
I recently graduated, so it’s imperative I build my network, which LinkedIn seems to be good for.
Comment by Roland Cailles — December 17, 2008 #
Dan, you have touched on a topic that I’ve been concerned about for some time now. I think as you discover more about the specific value of each networking channel you adjust accordingly. The beauty of all of this is that everyone now has the ability to fine-tune their various outlets on the fly. I think the professional website (dot com) is the final piece of the puzzle. All the free stuff is good, but only when it’s shored up by the dedicated website that you have committed to with time, creativity and cash.
Comment by Michael Gaudet — December 17, 2008 #
I talk with people all the time who wonder ‘how much’ to reveal and ‘to whom’, etc. This is a great post about how your personal brand has many facets and you can decide which facets to make visible, depending on your target audience.
My caution is that in all cases, you need to ensure you are being authentic. Personal branding is all about being yourself – your best self. So you need to know who you are first and then use various social media to reveal different aspects of who you are and what you are passionate about.
Best.
William
http://www.reachcc.com
Comment by William Arruda — December 19, 2008 #