The Same Laws Apply For Personal Brands as Any Brand
January 1, 2009 at 11:00 pm | In Book Reviews, Interview, People, Personal Branding, eBrand, marketing | 5 CommentsToday, I spoke with John Gerzema, who is the Chief Insights Officer for Young & Rubicam Group and an author. We discuss the three main challenges marketers face in today’s marketplace, what the brand bubble is and how to measure it, as well as his five-stage model for brand creativity and change. John, then gives us his perspective on personal branding.
What challenges do marketers have these days? How are they different than years ago?
Marketing is facing a convergence of forces:
- First the Fragmentation of everything — of channels, choice, modes and mediums means it’s no longer possible to build a brand on the back of mass media, the way we did in previous decades.
- Second, because of Social media (collaboration, communication and sharing… social networks, applications and consumer generated media), consumers rely on each other more than brands.
- And Personalization (products, experiences, mass customization and micro-addressability) means there are no USP’s anymore. A brand has a myriad of potential appeals to be personally relevant.
All of these new phenomena accelerate the decay in brand equity. Consumers are quicker to punish uninteresting brands. Marketing must adapt because brands have nowhere to hide. 
What is the Y&R’s Brand Asset Valuator (BAV) and what key research have you found on brands?
BrandAsset Valuator is the world’s largest continuously updated study of brands. We’ve invested over $ 115 million dollars and each year we interview over 500,000 consumers in 44 countries. We’ve tracked consumer perceptions of over 40,000 brands since1993. In fact, we’ve opened up the database for anyone to research hundreds of brands in our study.
What is the brand bubble and why do you think it will burst soon? What can we do today to prepare for it?
“We believe another crisis is brewing on Wall Street: The financial markets think brands are worth more than the consumers who buy them.”
Main Street offers a different view of brands than Wall Street: While brand value increased 80% in three decades, brand awareness declined 20% — brand quality eroded by 24% — trust in brands declined by a staggering 50%. And 85% of brands were either stagnant or declining in brand differentiation.
The first thing we must acknowledge: This is not a brand problem; it’s a business problem. When consumers fall out of love with brands, shareholder value is at risk. CEO’s are leveraging their brands to make promises of future earnings to shareholders. Today, brands are 30% of the market cap of S&P 500, or almost $ 4 trillion dollars. The 250 most valuable brands are worth $ 2.197 trillion dollars, which exceeds the GDP of France. Even the world’s top 10 most valuable brands are larger than the market capitalization of 70% of U.S. public companies. So we’re advising clients to completely re-think marketing from a cost of doing business, to a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders.
The 21st century CEO must be the ‘Brand Manager in Chief’. The best CEO’s think like CMO’s. And the best CMO’s must think like CEO’s. Together, they must bring marketing to the forefront of business strategy in order to access and integrate other functions of the business.
“Marketing isn’t a department, but a way of thinking across the company. Marketing is now everyone’s concern and a business imperative, as important as any strategic function in the enterprise.”
What is your five-stage model for brand creativity and change?
In the book we walk the reader through a five-stage model to drive the brand through their organization and to collaborate from the standpoint of what the consumer wants and what the brand needs. This process involves the entire enterprise recognizing that the brand imperatives are one and the same as the organizational imperatives. Every department and division, including outside vendors, suppliers, partners – everyone in the brand’s value chain – plays a role in fueling the energy of the brand, by contributing creativity and ideas that lead the brand forward. The company has to become what we call an Energy-driven Enterprise, and this especially means that the entire company has to become marketing-led, not just a company with a marketing department.
Most importantly, in developing the process to ignite energy into their brands, we identified what we call the Five Laws of Energy. These five laws now govern the new ConsumerLand, where consumers have new demands and unparalleled power. These five laws help enterprises re-examine how they approach and implement their creativity, their messaging, their flexibility and ability to evolve their brand, their approach to marketing, and their use of strategies and tactics.

Do you have any tips for people wanting to create personal brands? You can use some of the research you’ve already discovered to answer this question.
The same laws apply for personal brands as any brand — Have a unique point of difference (your differentiation) and continuously innovate around it (energy). Today’s social media and fragmentation described above offer any individual extraordinary opportunity to brand themselves and gain a following quickly. The key as with any brand is to also have integrity and ‘walk your talk’. So the brand promise —the person’s content, delivery and dialogue are all critical factors to providing a brand experience that consumers believe is unique and enduring.
——-
John Gerzema is Chief Insights Officer for Young & Rubicam Group. He is the author of The Brand Bubble. One of the early founders of account planning in American advertising, John has guided brand strategies to global business and creative acclaim. Previously, John ran Fallon’s international network and founded offices in Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Sao Paulo. He holds a master’s degree in integrated marketing from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and a B.S. in marketing from The Ohio State University.
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.






















I agree that marketing should be viewed as a revenue driver as opposed to a cost center. Most companies get this wrong and this is part of the reason for brand erosion and the decline of trust in brands.
However, there is tremendous opportunity for companies and individuals who learn how to position themselves correctly and reengineer their brands for the next round of economic growth.
Any thoughts out there?
Comment by Chad Levitt — January 2, 2009 #
Thanks for the great information. Wish you great 2009.
Comment by Abu — January 2, 2009 #
Wow I never thought about it but it’s so true.
Whenever I am buying something new I search for reviews on the product to get other people’s views and experience of the product and that is definitely a deciding factor for me.
I don’t care what type of brand there is if people are saying bad things about it.
I also seem to favor the company providing me with easy to find information, and training on the product.
So I do think that the brand bubble is in danger and I guess I am one to partly blame for that.
I don’t spend more money just because the brand is named this or that.
I would however spend more money on a high quality product that will last regardless of brand.
I think that Companies need to focus on making their Superior quality product as great and as bug free as close to perfection as possible and let that become the “brand” of their company.
To get people to buy company X product not because they are company X but because their products are just oustandingly utterly awesome.
-Tobias Fransson
Comment by tobiasfransson — January 2, 2009 #
Hot and sizzling as usal dan. welcome to a great year. Every CEO must take this piece seriously if their brands will last the econmic crunch
Comment by yinka olaito — January 2, 2009 #
Hey Dan – great interview/post as always.
But I disagree.
The same “laws” (overused) may apply — but they are converse (great brand) when it applies to personal brands.
Fragmentation, social media, and personalization is the very reasons WHY personal brands are so relevant and prevalent today. It’s why so many corporate (aka, impersonal) brands are desperately trying to figure out social media – that is, trying to make it work like mass media (think: square heads to round blogs – tho Obama did figure it out). However, corporate brands have been able to leverage the power personal branding through mascots ever since the first brand developed (Quaker).
My point is that you can take every simple problem of corporate, impersonal brands and view as an opportunity and advantage for personal brands… especially service professionals (lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, consultants, et al) who rarely had the time and money budget for mass consumer advertising, where the 2.0 world has become a savior or natural media for us.
The only thing we can learn from corporate brands is what not to do (micro branding & messy extensions). And let’s laugh at their miserable failures. And then charge them a lot of money for helping them embrace the power of personal branding – from mascot development to rainmaker training.
Happy 09,
~ Vikram Rajan
PracticeMarketingAdvisors.com
Comment by Vikram Rajan — January 2, 2009 #