How to Brand Yourself When You Have a Twin
December 23, 2008 at 3:52 pm | In Brand Yourself As, Misc, Personal Branding, Success Strategies | 6 CommentsWhen you have a unique name, face, personal brand statement and skill set, differentiation is natural and fairly easy. Out of everything I just mentioned, your face is perhaps the most important asset you have, both online and offline. We spoke about how to brand yourself with business cards some time ago and how your cards should contain a picture on one side because that’s how people will remember you. When was the last time you forgot a face? Unless you meet someone when they are five years old and then visit them when they are twenty-five, there aren’t drastic changes in their physical appearance. Of course, people can gain and lose weight, change their hair color, grow taller and have their skin age, but for the most part their appearance remains the same.![]()
You officially have a twin brother/sister
How can you brand yourself so you separate yourself from your twin? People get confused when they meet twins all the time. It’s nearly impossible to remember their names. You are probably guilty of trying to analyze them and pick them apart! People who really scrutinize twins typically say “oh it’s that one with the mole.” Even parents of twins can get confused at first. Over time, they figure it out because they have to.
Predicaments
- The twins interview at the same company, at the same time, for the same position.
- One twin goes on a date with a guy and then the guy sees the other twin the next morning.
- The two twins sit in class and the teacher swaps their grades.
- One twin sleeps in, while the other twin receives an award that his/her twin won.
- One twin starts an online TV show and gets sick. The other twin takes over and isn’t as funny, so viewers notice and comment.
- A hiring manager is conducting research for an open position, finds both twins Facebook accounts and selects the wrong twin for the position.
How to differentiate yourself as a twin
1. Play up your name as much as possible. Whenever you have the chance to say or write your name, do it and repeat it. Purchase your unique domain name and accounts on the leading social networks. If you are using a picture of yourself online, then edit your name into it.
2. Use your hair as a secret weapon. The picture of the Olsen Twins depicts the girls with two completely different hair styles. Anyone in the world can have a different style, whether it’s long, curled, or standing up. Even if you’re triplets, you can change this on a dime.
3. Buy a different wardrobe. If you both wear the same black ACDC t-shirt everyday, no one will ever get your name right and I wouldn’t blame them. Hopefully, if you are a twin, you will have a different favorite color and clothing style. Don’t borrow each others clothing because you have the same weight and chest size.
4. Follow your passion and don’t copy. Some twins just hold the same profession because they are always around each other and rub off on one another. Try to follow your passion instead of just taking the easy path. You will regret it later if you don’t.
Brand Yourself as a Mathematician or Become Obsolete
September 30, 2008 at 11:58 pm | In Book Reviews, Brand Yourself As, Career Development, Interview, People, Personal Branding | 1 CommentToday, I spoke with Ian Ayres, who is an author and law professor at Yale. He shares insights as to why you really need to learn about statistics and how companies are using these so-called “Supercrunchers” to conduct business.
Why do we need to understand numbers to succeed and survive in our world? Should every college student have to take a statistics class before they graduate?
Every college student should definitely take statistics
before graduation. I’d even think we should mandate it in high school. Only about 2% of college students use calculus in their subsequent lives. But 100% of college graduates can use statistics to understand the meaning of political polls or of medical studies or to understand advice about how to invest for retirement.
There’s some progress here. I’m heartened to see that many Algebra and Pre-Algebra text books are sneaking in statistics (often by brute force). But it is an afterthought and not clear that teachers actually teach these sections or those students come away knowing how to compute for example a test of statistical significance in the difference of two means.
Which companies are looking at databases to find unseen connections to predict human behavior? Do you know any specific people who are “stand-out” number crunchers?
Virtually every Fortune 500 company now is doing some kind of data mining. The difference is in the quality of the number crunching that is being done. The book “Competing on Analytics” does a good job of giving an idea of some of the best companies (including Harahs for example). A lot of companies are stuck at just doing descriptive statistics. They are only pulling cross tabs and using dashboards. The next level up is doing more sophisticated scoring. The next phase is to improve quality of scoring prediction and pay more attention to the precision of the predictions. One of the coolest things about regressions is that the same technique that makes a prediction, simultaneously tells you the precision of that prediction.
What is a “super cruncher” and how do we become one? How does that differ from an “intuitivist”? 
Super crunchers are using traditional tools of regression and randomization but they are applying them to mammoth datasets and they are having impacts on a scale that we’ve never seen before. So size, speed and scale are the hallmarks of super crunching. Super crunchers still use their intuitions, but they are willing to put their intuitions to the test. To become a super cruncher, you need to be trained in the techniques of randomization and regression. If your organization is not using BOTH of these techniques, you’re presumptively screwing up.
Can you explain how the “super cruncher” phenomenon will impact the workplace, recruitment and how we manage our personal brands?
Super Crunching tends to take discretion away from line employees. The front-line tasks tend to become more scripted.
Ian, please list the top 5 skills that you would recommend we all work on. 
You need to learn how to:
- 1) generate testable hypotheses
- 2) run randomized tests
- 3) run regressions
- 4) analyze the results of the regressions and randomized trials
- 5) use the results to generate more testable hypotheses
I’d recommend starting with running randomized tests. The new chapter that’s been added to the paperback editions, talks about free software that Microsoft and Google are giving away to help you start regressing and randomizing. It’s really easy and free to run randomized tests on your own websites. Finally, checkout my prediction tools if you want to start generating some predictions about things in your own life.
——
Ian Ayres is a lawyer and an economist. He is the William K. Townsend Professor at Yale Law School and a Professor at Yale’s School of Management.Professor Ayres is a regular commentator on public radio’s Marketplace and a columnist for Forbes magazine. His research has been featured on PrimeTime Live, Oprah and Good Morning America and in Time and Vogue magazines. Professor Ayres has published 9 books and over 100 articles on a wide range of topics. In 2007, he published Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart.
Brand Yourself as a Movie Director: An Interview with Tom Clifford
February 12, 2008 at 11:49 am | In Brand Yourself As, Interview, People, Personal Branding | 1 CommentThis is part of my series of posts called “Brand Yourself As.” Today, I d
ecided to interview Tom Clifford, who directs corporate videos. As you can see to stage right, there is a picture of Tom in his director’s uniform (notice the hat). If you have an angle or a unique personal brand, please email me and I’ll try and include you as well.
Tom is an award-winning filmmaker and he thinks “remarkable organizations deserve remarkable videos.” For 23 years, Tom has been helping companies tell their story by producing award-winning remarkable documentary videos. Companies from Fortune 500’s to non-profits use his films for marketing, recruiting and retention, sharing corporate values and more. From CEO’s to the front-line, Tom makes people feel comfortable being in front of the camera.
_____
Me: What are 3 ways you’ve branded yourself as a director online?
Tom: The first, and foremost, is through my blog, “Bringing Brands to Life!”
I remember in the summer of 2006, scouring the web looking for blogs, not static sites, from other corporate filmmakers. I couldn’t find any. That “void” prompted me to put a stake in the ground and start writing about my 20+ year experience as a corporate filmmaker. “Bringing Brands to Life!” has recently been picked up by Advertising Age’s Power 150 List, so I’m thrilled at this honor!
Second, I created a Squidoo lens, “Corporate Video: Is Yours Remarkable?”
Being a Seth Godin fan, I was first in line two years ago when he launched Squidoo. The lens continues to generate a lot of traffic to my blog and it’s one of the best moves one can make to start “finding their voice” on-line. That lens has really paid off. When searching “corporate videos” in Google, my Squidoo lens consistently appears high in the results, appearing around fourth or fifth, or at least in the top ten. Once a person lands on my lens, it points them right to my blog.
Third, my LinkedIn profile has been extremely helpful in growing my network in ways I’d never thought possible. Plus, creating a custom url of my LinkedIn profile usually puts my name on the first page of Google searches.
Me: What brands need the most help in coming to life?
Tom: In my own experience, I’ve found that it’s brands that are trying to express and capture that “invisible and human spirit” in each of us. When companies talk about “innovation, values, team spirit, caring, diversity, support and team work” and such, video can show these qualities in action very clearly.
Imagine hearing different employees sharing their personal points of view about these concepts while seeing them “in action.” The documentary format lends itself incredibly well to these ideas. Most times, it’s as “real, authentic, emotional and engaging” as possible. And just to clarify, I favor the documentary and “real people” approach only because this is how I’ve been capturing stories for many years. It’s not to say other forms and styles do not work.
Me: You produce many videos, but which are the most successful? Are you looking to generate buzz by making a viral video?
Tom: The most successful videos are ones capturing personal stories. It doesn’t matter how small or large your organization is; an organization is made up of people. And people have stories.
Since we are hard-wired to tell and share our stories to one another, it makes sense, to me anyways, to discover and capture those stories and feelings from an employee’s (or other) perspective. My approach is to capture one person or perhaps a few people to tell a company story. I’ll look for diversity in the voices and diversity in the stories. These voices wind up creating an interesting video story; a story creating an emotional connection with the viewers.
Viral videos? Think about this for a moment.
What’s the first thing that happens when a video story fades to black? Silence. Talking. Conversation. Sharing. What’s viral? Talking and sharing, of course. Of course, new technologies enable more eyeballs to see these stories. But the premise remains the same: ignite conversation. In the end, I’m interested in igniting conversations and sparking action…all aimed at helping clients solve problems or raise awareness about an issue.
Me: What are your thoughts about production quality vs blogger “podcast” quality?
Tom: Great question! 22 years ago, my mentor said something to me in the edit room which has never left me. He said, “I’d rather see a great story on paper than a poor story filmed in Panavision.”
So, capturing stories is in my DNA. Since every member of my team is first-rate, I honestly don’t ever have to worry about quality. It’s embedded in everything we do. My focus is always on the story and helping to move an audience to action. “Why are we capturing this?” “What difference will this story make to those watching it?” “What happens when the video story fades to back?” “Who can tell this story?” “What emotions do we want to capture?” These questions drive me in every project.
With that said, “blogger quality” video certainly has a place and one I’m all for embracing.
Here’s how I see it: in the end, all this new technology enables the sharing of our stories. And that’s a great thing!
Me: You own directortom.com, but not thomasclifford.com. What is your reasoning here? I know that you’ve branded yourself as director tom, but what about your real name?
Tom: Well, that reminds me of a story that happened in the summer of 1999…
I had dinner with a client after filming a full day and he said, “You know, you should grab ‘directortom dot com.’ Being busy producing, I never really followed up with the idea. But I always entertained the idea once and a while and I’d often bounce the name off friends and clients to see their reaction. They all loved it..it’s easy to spell and easy to remember. Seven years later, when I started blogging, I remembered that dinner and grabbed the name. If I recall, my name had been taken, so it’s worked out well in the end.
Nothing like a happy ending, right?
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
























